Challenging Orthodoxy in Strategic Competition: Introduction to Volume 2, Number 1
Keywords:
Strategic Competiton, Copenhagen School, security studies, security strategy, strategic studies, international relationsAbstract
Challenging orthodoxy in scholarship involves temptation, satisfaction, and above all: Danger. Scholars are often tempted to connect their narrow areas of expertise to adjacent issues, because doing so can produce new and valuable insights. However, if they push that integration too far, the analysis can become so broad and interconnected that it loses focus and rigor; a phenomenon we call the “everything is nothing” problem at the Irregular Warfare Initiative. In other words, when everything connects to everything else, meaningful and disciplined analysis becomes difficult. The key is finding the right balance between innovation and analytical discipline. That tension is what this issue (volume 2, number 1) intends to explore.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Strategic Competition

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Journal of Strategic Competition are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This permits anyone to share, adapt, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially, as long as proper attribution is provided to the original author(s) and the journal.